Abortion Is Slavery VII:  Minority Genocide

motherhood, abortion, bodily autonomy

Abortion is slavery. Not simply like. Not a comparison. Not an analogy. Without qualification, without condition, categorically, undeniably, abortion is slavery. With slavery, a slave owner owns a slave thing. With abortion, a woman owns a pregnancy thing.

It is undeniable that, before the Civil War, slave thing businesses targeted minorities, almost exclusively Africans and African Americans; and it is undeniable that abortion businesses target not only pregnancy things, but minority pregnancy things.

Minority Human Things

Of the over four million slave things bought and sold, born and died in America before the Civil War, almost all of them were of dark-skinned minorities, and of those almost all of them were African or born here of an African mother or of a mother who was part African, many of their children sired by the non-African masters of their mothers.

All statements of data about abortions in the U.S. are estimates. One such estimate is that of the over approximately 62,000,000 pregnancy thing murders here in the United States since 1973, over half of them, about 32,000,000 of the dead, were babies of minority mothers, and of those about two-thirds were African-American and about one third were Mexican-American or Hispanic-American.  In rough numbers, over 19,000,000 dead black pregnancy things and over 13,000,000 dead brown pregnancy things.

Mothers of minority children here – African-American, Mexican-American, and Hispanic-American – account for less than 12% of the entire population, but for over 60% of abortions. Their aborted pregnancy things are significantly more than half the total of the dead.

Since 1973 more African American babies have been aborted than the total number of African American deaths from AIDS, violent crimes, accidents, cancer, and heart disease combined.

Does this simply happen by accident?  Without malicious intent, fiendish planning or evil purpose? Is it just sad karma or bad luck that a minority unborn child in Manhattan has a less than 50-50 chance to exit a female within whom it is growing alive? Why do activists fighting abortion, describing it as “black genocide,” assert that “the most dangerous place for an African-American is in the womb” and that “abortion or population control is the most institutionalized form of racism” in America?

Tell The Black & Brown Babies It Was Just Business

There is a  business reason many abortion businesses make an effort to price their killing services not only at a good price point for profits but also as low as they can in certain areas. The majority of their customers, according to some studies 75%, qualify as poor or ‘low-income.’ Many abortion businesses, not wanting to turn away customers who can pay something, have a ‘sliding scale’ by which they charge for their killing services.

The abortion business national chains try to explain away the true basis for their branch or franchisee location choices with a “You going to believe us or you going to believe your eyes?” defense. Among the many “Us or your eyes” excuses for their RETA (racial eugenic targeted abortion) policies, national chain abortion businesses and franchisors argue:  we have a business to run so our primary motivation is not eugenics nor is it racism, but it is to locate abortion businesses most strategically; or they say apparent location ‘disparity’ is not based on any eugenics doctrine or racist beliefs, but by supply and demand; or of course they say, a business is going to locate where, in its view based on its studies and demographics, it will thrive.

According to these abortion business people, it is simply accidental happenstance that so many minority pregnancy things end up dead; and, for the eugenicists among them, a happy, merely fortuitous happenstance. They consider saying that they are motivated by their RETA policy is an insult. They become incensed if one has the effrontery, the churlish audacity, or the prejudiced pusillanimity to provide verbatim quotations from so many abortion advocates who were also, going back over a century, eugenicists and racists.

And damn anyone who dares to use the actual words of their patron demon Margaret Sanger to prove what anyone and everyone can now plainly see:   her whole adult life was a crusade for eugenics and racism. It was her motivation, her guiding principle, and the basis for her business, Planned Parenthood. Minority genocide is her legacy. Eugenics is its foundation.

Minority Genocide in Aunt Thommie’s Cabin

In Aunt Thommie’s Cabin, (“Thommie”) by this present author,  when the high school counselor, Letty Steiner, secretly takes young Harriet McCorvey (Harry) to the Preferred Personhood business location for the first time, Harry notices that they have to drive through a “rundown neighborhood” (Thommie, p. 10); and Simone Legarde, Preferred Personhood branch manager/director, had the thought that driving her Mercedes “through the ghetto all these months was going to be well worth it” when she brokered the sale of Harry’s Down Syndrome twins to a research company. (Thommie,  p.  21).

Location, Location, Location

It is a fact that, in most large cities in America, almost eighty percent of the business locations of the large abortion businesses are in or near minority neighborhoods or areas. An accident?  Another happy happenstance? Letty gives Harry one often-publicized false talking-point justification for such choice of locations:

“Harry was paying more attention to the area as they turned onto the street of the Preferred Personhood building. Almost everyone she saw, walking, driving, sitting in their yards, was either African-American or Hispanic-American.

“Letty,” she asked, “Why do they have their location here? This really doesn’t seem that safe.”

“I guess they figure these folks need these services more. And they care about these people. They are really impacted hard by an unwanted life change. Most of them are already on welfare. Having a baby can mean a girl never gets to leave here, no college, no job, no future, no life. That’s why most of the women and girls who come here are minorities, why half the terminations all over the country, or even a little more than half, are for them, even though their mothers make up less than twenty percent of the overall population. It’s a real blessing to them. It can mean a whole new life. Preferred Personhood really cares about them to provide this care so close to home for them. And it reduces the load on the welfare systems.” (Thommie, p. 29).

Genocide in Mrs. Stowe’s Books

“Genocide” as such is not present, explicitly, in Harriet Beecher Stowe’s Uncle Tom’s Cabin (“Cabin”) or in her later book, A Key To Uncle Tom’s Cabin (“Key”). What is there is the fact that before the Civil War, many in America, both North, and South, believed that slaves were inferior sub-human property, which is the foundational belief for both racism and minority eugenics in America.

In Chapter XVI of Cabin, Mrs. Stowe a slave owner says this:

“Now, there’s no way with servants,” said Marie, “but to put them down, and keep them down. It was always natural to me, from a child. . . . I hold to being kind to servants—I always am; but you must make ’em know their place.  . . .

“Why,” said Miss Ophelia, bluntly, “I suppose you think your servants are human creatures, and ought to have some rest when they are tired.”

“Certainly, of course. I’m very particular in letting them have everything that comes convenient,—anything that doesn’t put one at all out of the way, you know.

“You see, I brought my own property and servants into the connection, when I married St. Clare, and I am legally entitled to manage them my own way.

“Don’t you believe that the Lord made them of one blood with us?” said Miss Ophelia, shortly.

“No, indeed not I! A pretty story, truly! They are a degraded race.”

” . . . But as to putting them on any sort of equality with us, you know, as if we could be compared, why, it’s impossible! “ .

In Chapter XIX of Cabin, Miss Ophelia describes her own father:

“ . . . he considered the negro through all possible gradations of color, as an intermediate link between man and animals, and graded all his ideas of justice or generosity on this hypothesis. . . .

“The fact is, though he has fallen on democratic times, and embraced a democratic theory, he is to the heart an aristocrat, as much as my father, who ruled over five or six hundred slaves. . . .

“There must, he says, be a lower class, given up to physical toil and confined to an animal nature; and a higher one thereby acquires leisure and wealth for a more expanded intelligence and improvement, and becomes the directing soul of the lower . . .”.

In Part  III, Chapter 1 of A Key To Uncle Tom’s Cabin  Mrs. Stowe states:

“It is because the negro is considered an inferior animal, and not worthy of any better treatment, that the system which relates to him and the treatment which falls to him are considered humane.” (Key. p. 126; emphasis added).

In a chapter in Key entitled,” Public Opinion Formed by Education,” Mrs. Stowe states that pro-slavers and enslavers view slave things not as human beings, but as “brutes”:

“When the holders of slaves assert that they are, as a general thing, humanely treated, what do they mean? Not that they would consider such treatment humane if given to themselves and their children—no, indeed!—but it is humane for slaves.

They do, in effect, place the negro below the range of humanity, and on a level with brutes, and then graduate all their ideas of humanity accordingly.

They would not needlessly kick or abuse a dog or a negro. They may pet a dog, and they often do a negro. Men have been found who fancied having their horses elegantly lodged in marble stables, and to eat out of sculptured managers, but they thought them horses still; and, with all the indulgences with which good-natured masters sometimes surround the slave, he is to them but a negro still, and not a man. (Key, p. 132).

The democrat socialists, abortion business executives, and other abrotionarians realize the impact of characterizing abortion business practices as veiled “genocide.” Hence their efforts to ridicule and condemn those who accuse them of abortion genocide. These efforts, however, are fruitless. The facts and the truth show, undeniably, that abortion in America is genocidal.

Further Sources:  Minority  Genocide In America & Eugenics

“Abortion’s Devastating Impact Upon Black Americans,” Arthur Goldberg, Feb. 11, 2019;

“Abortion’s Racial Gap – Even as the U.S. abortion rate is at its lowest since Roe v. Wade, women of color are five times as likely to terminate a pregnancy as their white counterparts. Why?” Zoe Dutton, The Atlantic, Sept. 12, 2014.

“Abortion and Race-For decades, abortion has disproportionately eliminated minority babies” April 25, 2018.

Black Genocide Org.

“Abortion as black genocide”: inside the black anti-abortion movement- A new documentary examines how fears of “black genocide” became part of mainstream anti-abortion activism,” P.R. Lockhart, Vox,  Jan 19, 2018.

“Black Genocide And The Black Leaders Who Support It,” Ryan Scott Bomberger, Raidiance Foundation,  Sept. 29, 2014.

Further Sources:  Margaret L. Higgins Sanger, Eugenicist

Margaret Sanger, the founder of the Planned Parenthood business, was a devout racist and a true-believer eugenicist who created the “Negro Project” designed to weed out “inferior” people, “human weeds,” and “human undergrowth” through segregation and sterilization. Her own magazine’s articles included statements to the effect that eugenic sterilization was an urgent need; and that America should act without delay to prevent the multiplication of bad stocks [nonwhite], and to preserve the well-endowed stocks [white] and to increase the birth-rate of the sound average population.

“Eugenic Sterilization: An Urgent Need,” Ernst Rudin [Nazi; served as Hitler’s Director of Genetic Sterilization, helped establish Nazi Society for Racial Hygiene, honored with awards by Adolf Hitler personally; friend of M. Sanger], The Birth Control Review [Sanger’s Magazine], April 1933.

“Selective Sterilization”, Leon Whitney, The Birth Control Review, June 1933 [praising the National Socialist – Nazi –  Third Reich’s pre-holocaust race purification programs].

“Killer Angel,” George Grant, 2001 [biography of Margaret Sanger.

“The Pivot of Civilization”, Margaret Sanger, et al. 1922; see, e.g., Ch. VIII, paragraph 12.

“My Way To Peace,” Margaret Sanger, Speech, Jan. 17, 1932. “(d) apply a stern and rigid policy of sterilization, and segregation to that grade of population whose progeny is already tainted or whose inheritance is such that objectionable traits may be transmitted to offspring.”; also:

“Eugenics and birth control”.

“Margaret Sanger was a eugenicist. Why are we still celebrating her?” John J. Conley, America, Nov. 27, 2017.

“Margaret Sanger, racist eugenicist extraordinaire,”  Arina Grossu, The Washington Times, May 5, 2014.

“Hitler, The Ku Klux Klan, and Margaret Sanger- Planned Parenthood clinics have followed along the same lines as its racist founder,” The Courier-Herald,  April 10, 2019;

“Margaret Sanger, Birth Control, and the Eugenics Movement,”.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest

1 thought on “Abortion Is Slavery VII:  Minority Genocide”

  1. Pingback: EARLY VVEEKEND EDITION – Big Pulpit

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.