Why Does the Church Teach that Mary was Assumed, Body and Soul?

assumption of mary, assumption, mary, blessed mother

The Solemnity of the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary falls on August 15, which is a Sunday in 2021.  While details are not known to us, we have been assured that the Blessed Mother was assumed body and soul into Heaven.  This has been known since the earliest days of Christianity!

After the Ascension of her Son, the Virgin Mary aided the beginnings of the Church with her prayers. Even after her Assumption into heaven, she continues to intercede for her children, to be a model of faith and charity for all, and to exercise over them a salutary influence deriving from the superabundant merits of Christ. The faithful see in Mary an image and an anticipation of the resurrection that awaits them and they invoke her as advocate, helper, benefactress and mediatrix.” (Compendium of the Catechism of the Catholic Church, # 197)

In the same metropolitan DC neighborhood as the Basilica of the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception and the Saint John Paul II National Shrine is the Franciscan Monastery of the Holy Land in America, which includes replicas of Holy Land shrines.  The monastery was envisioned when it would have been rare for an American to visit the actual Holy Land.

Some years ago, I recall being confused to see a replica of the “Tomb of Mary” in that DC monastery and wondered how it coincided with our belief in the Assumption. Subsequently, I have had it clarified for me that there are indeed “tombs” for the Blessed Mother in both Ephesus and Jerusalem, but there is nobody in either tomb (cf, Tim Staples, The Assumption of Mary in History).  Similar to the Holy Sepulchre itself, these are empty tombs.

After great mid-twentieth century appeal from the faithful and from the episcopacy, Pope Pius XII’s Munificentissimus Deus (1950) assured us that the Assumption was incontestable dogma:

13. Various testimonies, indications and signs of this common belief of the Church are evident from remote times down through the course of the centuries; and this same belief becomes more clearly manifest from day to day.

38. All these proofs and considerations of the holy Fathers and the theologians are based upon the Sacred Writings as their ultimate foundation. These set the loving Mother of God as it were before our very eyes as most intimately joined to her divine Son and as always sharing his lot. Consequently it seems impossible to think of her, the one who conceived Christ, brought him forth, nursed him with her milk, held him in her arms, and clasped him to her breast, as being apart from him in body, even though not in soul, after this earthly life. Since our Redeemer is the Son of Mary, he could not do otherwise, as the perfect observer of God’s law, than to honor, not only his eternal Father, but also his most beloved Mother. And, since it was within his power to grant her this great honor, to preserve her from the corruption of the tomb, we must believe that he really acted in this way.

41. Since the universal Church, within which dwells the Spirit of Truth who infallibly directs it toward an ever more perfect knowledge of the revealed truths, has expressed its own belief many times over the course of the centuries, and since the bishops of the entire world are almost unanimously petitioning that the truth of the bodily Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary into heaven should be defined as a dogma of divine and Catholic faith–this truth which is based on the Sacred Writings, which is thoroughly rooted in the minds of the faithful, which has been approved in ecclesiastical worship from the most remote times, which is completely in harmony with the other revealed truths, and which has been expounded and explained magnificently in the work, the science, and the wisdom of the theologians – we believe that the moment appointed in the plan of divine providence for the solemn proclamation of this outstanding privilege of the Virgin Mary has already arrived.”

44….we pronounce, declare, and define it to be a divinely revealed dogma: that the Immaculate Mother of God, the ever Virgin Mary, having completed the course of her earthly life, was assumed body and soul into heavenly glory.

In a general audience one half-century later, St Pope John Paul II (6/25/97) provided further clarification:

Some theologians have in fact maintained that the Blessed Virgin did not die and and was immediately raised from earthly life to heavenly glory. However, this opinion was unknown until the 17th century, whereas a common tradition actually exists which sees Mary’s death as her entry into heavenly glory.”

The New Testament provides no information on the circumstances of Mary’s death. This silence leads one to suppose that it happened naturally, with no detail particularly worthy of mention….As to the cause of Mary’s death, the opinions that wish to exclude her from death by natural causes seem groundless….Whatever from the physical point of view was the organic, biological cause of the end of her bodily life, it can be said that for Mary the passage from this life to the next was the full development of grace in glory, so that no death can ever be so fittingly described as a ‘dormition’ as hers.

Why?

So, why does the Church teach that the Blessed Virgin Mary was assumed – body and soul  – into Heaven?  Well, the short answer is because it’s true – the ultimate reason to believe anything!

While our own bodies will be separated from our souls at death, they will eventually be reunited.  As Dr. Scott Hahn notes, “Most of us don’t really believe in the resurrection of the body. Or we struggle to believe it….we don’t treat our bodies like sacred temples that belong in the heavenly courts” (Hope to Die: The Christian Meaning of Death and the Resurrection of the Body, Introduction). We are given a choice as to whether we truly want our united bodies and souls to spend all eternity with God and His mother.

Let the Assumption of the Blessed Mother remind us that God desires that we accept His unbelievably great offer for our united bodies and souls to spend all eternity with Him and His mother.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest

7 thoughts on “Why Does the Church Teach that Mary was Assumed, Body and Soul?”

  1. Joseph Tevington

    Kyle,

    Thanks for reading Pope Pius XII’s Munificentissimus Deus in its entirety and for being so forthright about your disbelief in the Assumption, as well as in the perpetual virginity of the Blessed Mother. As you well know, great minds in the Church have deeply reflected on these matters and come to conclusions opposite to your own.

    Mary’s perpetual virginity is absolutely NOT a sign that the Church thinks sex is “dirty.” The Church honors perpetual continence because it foregoes the great good of conjugal relations in the lifelong, indisollubile marriage of one woman and one man. I will grant to you that there is tremendous misunderstanding and lack of appreciation among Catholics for God’s beautiful news about marriage/family/sexuality. Lots of catechesis is needed!

    With regard to proper and respectful treatment of dead bodies, I think that you would enjoy reading Scott Hahn’s “Hope to Die: The Christian Meaning of Death and the Resurrection of the Body.”

    God bless,
    Joe Tevington

  2. I actually just read Munificentissimus Deus in its entirety, and I will say that I learned something. It gave me a new perspective, and it disturbed me a bit.

    Sadly, I saw no basis for the Assumption outside of some guys a long time ago theorized it. And supposedly people wanted it. But a theory or a desire does not make something true. There was no basis. The only basis was actually quite disturbing. It focused repeatedly on Mary’s “virginal” body which was a bit disgusting. Sex does not defile a body, and her body at death was not special because it may have been “virginal” (the perpetual virginity of Mary is another belief with no sound basis). The idea that sex defiles a body is harmful and needs to be rejected. The second thought that was hit repeatedly is that bodily death is degrading. The completion of our lives on earth and the return of our bodies to ashes should not be viewed as degrading either.

    The apostles/disciples wrote plenty of things down regarding what happened while Jesus was alive as well as after he died. Mary being assumed bodily into heaven would’ve been a big event, yet it wasn’t written about. There is only one logical reason – because it didn’t happen.

  3. There is also this:
    We now know that the mother of a 33-year-old child might still have within her body clusters of fetal cells- her son’s cells in islands scattered throughout her body. At this point, these cells would either remain on Earth to die when all her cells died-couldn’t happen-, or be miraculously assumed. This was easier and neater.

  4. Pingback: MONDAY EDITION – Big Pulpit

  5. Joseph P Tevington

    Kyle,

    I encourage you to read Pope Pius XII’s Munificentissimus Deus (1950) in its entirety. While I have come to fully embrace this doctrine, there are some basic truths that have NEVER been formally declared dogma; there was no need to do so. In 1950, Pius XII made this declaration in response to a great call from the episcopacy and laity.

    God bless,
    Joe Tevington

  6. There is no proof or evidence laid out in this article. It is claimed that the assumption was known about since the earliest days of Christianity. Where is the documentary evidence of that? The earliest documentation that I’ve seen of the assumption being addressed is documents from the 3rd or 4th century where people started asking questions about what happened to Mary. They came up with a number of possibilities, and the idea of the assumption slowly gained in popularity.

    The Assumption is one of the flimsiest tenets of Catholicism, and it never should’ve been declared a dogma in 1950. If the church didn’t feel comfortable declaring it a dogma for the first 1,900+ years of its existence, what changed in 1950? As far as I can tell, nothing changed. The Assumption is still a story that originated with Christians in the 3rd or 4th century and was passed on. If someone was assumed into heaven, that would’ve been a big deal and the earliest Christians would’ve written about it. But they did not.

    1. Kyle, why is it so hard for you to accept that the Mother of God would be bodily assumed into heaven when the Bible states that Enoch and Elijah were assumed into heaven (Heb. 11:5, 2 Kgs. 2:11)? And as Tim Staples wrote in an article for Catholic Answers (2019) “Recently discovered Syriac fragments of stories about the Assumption of Mary have been dated as early as the third century.” Read the whole article —
      https://www.catholic.com/magazine/online-edition/the-assumption-of-mary-in-history

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.