Immorality of the Covid-19 Mass Vaccination Program – Part III

vaccination, covid, vaccine, vaccinated

By Steven Smith, Dr. Alan Moy, and Dr. Russell Gonnering

This is Part III of a three-part series on the covid vaccine and the mass vaccination campaign.

The thesis of this series is mass vaccination is a bad health policy because, by any reasonable standard or precedent, the genetic vaccines are not safe, not effective, and especially not necessary in many cases.  And mass vaccination is immoral because the general public is not being provided with the information necessary for informed consent and is instead being coerced into vaccination.

Thus, the Church should be advocating for rights of conscience and individual health autonomy.

In Part I of this series, we established that a mass vaccination program is not necessary because covid-19 is not nearly as lethal as made out by the media; natural immunity is far superior to the vaccine-induced immunity; and, most importantly, people can prevent and treat covid-19 perfectly well without the genetic vaccines.

In Part II we established that the vaccines are not safe because they show higher absolute and relative adverse events compared to other approved vaccines (they are doing more harm than good) and are not effective.  They do not “protect others”, they will not eradicate covid, vaccine immunity is inferior to natural immunity, all they do is provide some degree of personal protection against severe covid-19, but better protection is available through safe and effective prophylaxis and early treatment without the risks of the genetic vaccines.

It should all be quite simple: we already possess safe and effective early treatment and prevention protocols – so the experimental vaccines are not necessary for personal protection.  Nor do they “protect others” – vaccinated persons get infected and transmit the disease, and high rates of vaccination are the likely cause of the rise of dominant variants, like Delta.  If individuals, fully informed about the known risks and uncertainties, elect to receive the experimental vaccine, that is their own personal health choice.

But it’s not that simple.  The powers-that-be are bound and determined to advance a mass vaccination agenda that is wreaking great social and spiritual harm in the process.

A note about terminology – the prior articles of this series used the term “gene therapy vaccines.”  They are not gene therapies in the traditional “therapeutic” sense.  They are vaccines that utilize a genetic delivery platform that may have uncertain consequences for the human genome[1] [2].  For simplicity in this article, we refer to them as genetic vaccines.

Societal Harms of Vaccine Propaganda and Coercion

There has been a relentless campaign to convince the public of the necessity of genetic vaccines; that they are not only safe and effective but the only response to covid-19.

This tyrannical focus on mass vaccination has been made manifest in myriad avenues of propaganda, deceit, and coercion and is causing incalculable damage.

Let’s start with one of the often-repeated claims to advance the vaccination agenda: “99.5% of covid-19 deaths are from unvaccinated individuals.”  Claims like that have been made by the CDC (including CDC Director Rochelle Walensky) and parroted through news media outlets and social media.[3]

That statement is grossly misleading.

To arrive at the statistic of 99.5% unvaccinated deaths, the CDC cherry-picked data from certain states and included hospitalization and mortality data from January through June 2021, and used the CDC’s specific definition that you are only considered vaccinated 15 days after your second dose (for the mRNA vaccines).  In Dr. Walensky’s own words, “Those data were data that were from analyses in several states from January through June.”[4]  The vast majority of the United States population was unvaccinated during that timeframe.  As of January 1, 2021, only 0.5% of the U.S. population had received a single covid shot.  By June 15, only 48.7% were fully “vaccinated.”[5]

There is a similar disinformation campaign in force to characterize the unvaccinated as dangerous superspreaders.  President Biden recently made the statement that people who refuse the experimental genetic vaccines are essentially saying, “I have the freedom to kill you with my covid.”  As demonstrated in Part I, regarding the necessity, real-world data is showing the opposite to be true.  And yet there are authority figures like Arthur Caplan, Ph.D., an ethicist at NYU Grossman School of Medicine, stating “It’s okay for doctors to refuse to treat unvaccinated patients.”[6]  Prof. Caplan argues this on the basis of doctors’ right to protect their staff and other patients.  If he wants to be scientifically and ethically consistent, he should give every prospective patient a rapid covid test in an anteroom, as many of the “vaccinated” would be positive.  But this isn’t about science or the courageous practice of medicine, it is about fear, virtue signaling, and a twisted form of secular “faith”.

There is the continued accusation that the unvaccinated are causing variants.  As discussed in Part II, regarding effectiveness, basic epidemiology, and in-coming data show that it is likely the vaccinated who are causing dominant variants.  Despite this, Anthony Fauci has continued with the anti-science and inflammatory rhetoric that unvaccinated Americans could cause a fifth covid wave[7].

And now we see the latest attempt to villainize the unvaccinated is that they are overloading the health system and inhibiting medical care for the vaccinated – we address the errors in this depiction below in questions and objections.

It is reasonable to assume we will see ongoing efforts to scapegoat a host of negative events on the unvaccinated.  Economic issues.  Social unrest.  You name it.

All of this misleading and inflammatory rhetoric and propaganda has led to the dehumanization of people who elect to not be injected with the experimental genetic vaccine,[8] such as the now infamous front-page statement on Toronto Star, “If an unvaccinated person catches it from someone who is vaccinated, boohoo, too bad.  I have no empathy left for the willfully unvaccinated.  Let them die.”[9]

Without a doubt, the most damaging aspect of the mass vaccination campaign has been the suppression, villainization, and restriction of safe and effective prevention and early treatment of covid-19 using the many proven protocols anchored in medications such as Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin (as discussed in Part I).  The persecution of physicians who attempt to actually practice medicine[10], and the denial of that care to the general public, is the cause of the vast majority of fatalities and the continuing misery from SARS-CoV-2.

Most hospitals (sadly including most of the major Catholic hospital systems) will not dispense key components of life-saving multi-drug protocols (like Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine) and turn instead to dangerous and ineffective drugs like Remdesivir[11].  The result is the endless drone of stories of “lives senselessly lost because of remaining unvaccinated,” which is actually the story of 85-90% of lives senselessly lost because the CDC and FDA provide no useful early treatment guidance, hospitals and pharmacies refuse to dispense safe and effective medications, and physicians who treat covid-19 are threatened with loss of license (though there are some signs of hope[12]).

The Error of the Abortion Justification

While this series demonstrates the immorality of the mass vaccination program on the basis of medical facts alone, the abortion evil merits some brief comments.

All three available genetic vaccines are either tested or produced using at least one cell line derived from abortion (the HEK-293 cell line).  The moral justification of this “remote participation in evil” is principally anchored in the 2005 Pontifical Academy of Life study of the abortion contingency of the Rubella vaccine[13] – and the finding that the use of the vaccine was licit despite the connection to abortion.  That document specifically mentions the “HEK 293 aborted fetal cells line” and states “the fetal kidney material was obtained from an aborted fetus, in 1972 probably.”  The 2005 document implies that HEK-293 was developed from a single abortion.  As evil as that is, it has been questioned whether the writers of the 2005 document were aware that the HEK 293 line was obtained after harvesting cells from dozens and perhaps hundreds of other aborted babies.  And the kidney tissue samples (HEK stands for Human Embryonic Kidney) were most likely “harvested” while the baby was still alive and without pain killers because that method provides the best quality samples.  It is unknown what conclusion the authors of the 2005 document would have drawn had they known the full scope of the abortion evil, and it is unacceptable that we anchor our current moral justifications in that uncertain past.

In any event, the authors of the 2005 document never intended it to provide a blank check for continued use of abortion-derived cell lines.  Far from it.  They state the concern that “on a cultural level, the use of such vaccines contributes in the creation of a generalized social consensus to the operation of the pharmaceutical industries which produce them in an immoral way.”

Just as they predicted, the financial windfall of the genetic vaccines, their widespread use, and even the advocacy of their use by many Church leaders, will ensure a steady flow of abortion-compromised biomedical research and products.

And it doesn’t stop there.  The research community has now widely dropped the long-held 14-day limit on the gestation of embryonic human beings[14] and we are witnessing the inevitable increase in “chimera” research – both at the embryonic stage and the grisly combination of implanting tissues from aborted babies into lab animals[15].  All of this, in the name of science and all of it accelerated with the “success” of the experimental genetic vaccines.

As demonstrated in this series of articles, the covid-19 mass vaccination program doesn’t stand on its own medical merits based on the overstated safety, necessity, and efficacy of the vaccines.  Let alone does it justify the participation in this grisly and calculated application of abortion as well as advancing it.

The Immorality of Vaccine Mandates

We now come specifically to the issue of vaccination mandates.  Because covid-19 is not nearly as lethal as made out to be, and because of the flaws of genetic vaccines and the availability of safe and effective alternatives, many people have no intention to be vaccinated.  And thus the mass vaccination program necessitates mandates – by which we mean both explicit and implicit mandates (by placing coercive, punitive, anti-scientific burdens on the unvaccinated).

The covid-19 vaccines have dramatically departed from any prior vaccine safety norm.  The 1976 swine flu vaccine, with 43 million vaccinations, was stopped after 1 case of Guillain-Barre per 100,000 vaccinations and 53 deaths.[16]  Further, “post-marketing surveillance” (monitoring vaccine performance after being made available to the general public) is a critically important component of vaccine-safety monitoring and yet it is unclear whether or how any meaningful monitoring is being performed with the genetic vaccines; there have been no formal safety reports from the FDA or CDC.

As has been made abundantly clear, from a medical perspective, there is no basis for vaccine mandates.  Let’s turn now to the spiritual fruit of the vaccination mandates:

  1. Engendering hatred between two classes of people, the vaccinated and unvaccinated, with the unvaccinated more and more being portrayed as less than human.
  2. Coercing people to receive the genetic vaccine against their well-formed intellect and conscience.
  3. Causing health professionals and political leaders to engage in the worst of ethical practices: manipulation of data, spreading misinformation, and fearmongering.
  4. Regarding fearmongering, the mass vaccination campaign is inseparable from the overall covid-19 fear campaign. From early in the so-called pandemic rational people have recognized that only a well-defined cohort of the population is particularly vulnerable to covid-19 (those over 60 and with specific comorbidities) and for the rest of the population, SARS-CoV-2 is little different from any other cold or flu virus with readily available prevention and treatment methods.     Instead of this rational response to continuing with life, the government, institutional medicine, big pharma, and media have driven society down a path of fear (the great enemy of faith), that has inflicted incalculable physical, mental and spiritual harm.  Sad, but unsurprising, is the negative impact on infants[17] and teens[18].
  5. The unacknowledged pandemic of deaths of despair[19] and overall degradation of health due to senseless lockdowns [20] [21] will have an inevitable negative consequence on spiritual health (physical desolation leads to spiritual desolation).
  6. Restrictions on worship and access to the Sacraments continue in some forms to this day. It remains to be seen when or if Church attendance will return to pre-lockdown levels.
  7. Engendering a crude, communistic calculus on the value of life, and an ethos that the ends justify the means. Essentially the government is guiding society to a mindset that “We can kill and injure this group of people to save this other group of people.”   We hear similar words in scripture,  “Is it not better that one man should die…”
  8. Cynically playing upon and deforming people’s natural desire to be part of a grand cause and community (discussed below).
  9. Normalizing people to precepts transhumanism – engendering an unquestioning acceptance of radical therapies in the name of public health, personal protection, enhancement, and so on.

No matter how one approaches it, medically or spiritually, there is little if any good fruit from vaccination mandates and much that is rotten.

Answering Common Questions and Objections

“We require several vaccines in the US, why should the covid-19 vaccines be any different?”

There are significant differences between the historical vaccines (e.g. polio and smallpox) and the covid-19 genetic vaccines:

  1. The historical vaccines went through legitimate evaluation – typically 5-7 years or more – to assess longer-term effects. And their safety has now been reasonably well demonstrated for decades.  This is not the case for covid-19 vaccines.
  2. Historical vaccines are not “leaky.” They activate the body’s broad immune system and are effective at eradicating the virus and preventing transmission and mutation.
  3. That said, there are still health issues and adverse effects from the historical vaccines. But since they are fully approved there is recourse for people who are harmed by the vaccines to seek compensation.   This is not the case for the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna covid-19 vaccines, which are shielded from liability under the emergency use authorization (the red-herring of “approval” of the Comirnaty vaccine notwithstanding).
  4. The historical diseases have a low rate of mutation, facilitating the development of a vaccine that remains effective for years. This is not the case for SARS-CoV-2.  There is a reason there has never been a “cure for the common cold” (aka coronavirus) – because it mutates rapidly.
  5. Along the same lines, the historical viruses do not transfer to-and-from an animal pool that they can transfer to and thus increase the mutation rate.
  6. Most of the historical viruses are far more deadly and do not have the risk stratification of covid-19, thus mass vaccination is necessary. This is not the case with covid-19, for which we know the at-risk population and can selectively protect it.

“If the covid-19 vaccines are so bad, why aren’t we hearing about It?”

It must be understood that there is literally an army of ideological censors and “fact-checkers” (not to mention internet bots) at work 24/7 to scrub anything from the internet that goes against the pro-vaccine narrative.  YouTube boasted taking down 10 million “bad” videos per quarter[22].

Let’s continue with the topic of Ivermectin since that is a major focus of censorship and propaganda as of the writing of this article.  YouTube’s blocked videos include the Nobel-prize-winning inventor of Ivermectin, Dr. Satoshi Omura, discussing its usefulness as a therapeutic for covid-19.[23]  Or, if you google search “covid Ivermectin” you will find endless articles conflating the dangers of unprescribed use of veterinary Ivermectin with safe and effective professional prescription of Ivermectin for humans as part of multidrug protocols.  You will be hard-pressed to find the dozens of studies demonstrating the effectiveness of Ivermectin, or that if properly prescribed it is safer than Tylenol.   Nor will you find the chairman of the Tokyo Medical Association, Dr. Haruo Ozaki, publicly recommending all doctors in Japan immediately start using Ivermectin to treat covid-19 because countries that distributed Ivermectin experienced 2.2 covid-19 deaths per 100,000 vs 29.3 per 100,000 in countries that did not[24].

On a side note, while safe, effective, and inexpensive Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin remain anathema, Pfizer and Merck have now come out with ballyhooed new drugs (“Pfizermectin” and “Merckloroquine”) that have been subjected to less rigorous regulatory review than Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin, have long-term unknown risks, and are extremely expensive.

Here’s one more example of the manipulation by internet search engines, regarding the analysis by Walach et al. that was referenced in the “vaccine safety” section of Part I, and concludes the genetic vaccines cost two lives for every three that are saved (in fact, the vaccines probably cost even more lives).  A google search for that article will return endless results of criticisms (no new criticisms, just media parroting the original criticism).  Nowhere in the search results will you find the very rational rebuttal of the authors[25] – it has been all but scrubbed from the internet.

At the same time, the mainstream media presents a never-ending parade of anecdotal (and usually unverified) stories depicting an unvaccinated person dying from covid-19 and their loved ones (typically a parent) ruing the decision to not get vaccinated.  In fact, there are many incidents of people ruing their decision to be injected with the genetic vaccines[26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] but those are never covered by the mainstream media.

This strategy is known as “flood the zone” by which those in control saturate media with their narrative and ruthlessly censor any opposing information.

The propaganda and information suppression advances through almost every institution.  The AMA reports “96% of practicing physicians are vaccinated.”  It is hardly ever revealed that this is a statistic from a survey of a mere 300 physicians (there are approximately 1 million active physicians in the U.S.)[33].  Another survey found only 42% of physicians fully vaccinated[34] but that won’t show up in media reports.  As another example, OSHA, one of the most rigorously health and safety conscious agencies in the U.S., has announced they are not requiring employers to log vaccine-related injuries at least through May 2022.  Why are they waving vaccine reporting?  “OSHA does not wish to have any appearance of discouraging workers from receiving COVID-19 vaccination, and also does not wish to disincentivize employers’ vaccination efforts.”[35]

The propaganda advances in more subtle ways.   Consider this report of what should be the deeply concerning event of hepatitis being “reactivated” by the shot (this is more common than portrayed): “While these vaccines have good efficacy and are safe, … she had a reactivation of hepatitis C infection after vaccination with the mRNA-based Pfizer–BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine.  This reactivation manifested with jaundice, loss of consciousness, hepatic coma, and death[36]  (emphasis added).

Covid reporting is chock-a-block with this reimagining of the morbid joke, “the surgery was a success, but the patient died.”  The medical community, in the face of this health disaster, are cowed and brainwashed into towing the “safe and effective” mantra.

“The vaccines are FDA approved.”

Yes, the FDA rushed “full approval” of the COMIRNATY version of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine; but (1) the approval is approved for a license with terms and requirements for clinical tests over the next five years, and (2) COMIRNATY is not available in the U.S. (a prize to you if you can find it anywhere) – most everyone will still be injected with the original Pfizer-BioNTech version which remains under the EUA liability shield.[37]  In short, every dose of vaccine being administered in the U.S. is experimental and being dispensed under the Emergency Use Authorization.  The claims of “FDA approval” are disingenuous and misleading.

“How could so many people be taken in by misinformation about the lethality of covid and necessity of the vaccines?”

This question builds on the prior – the mass vaccination campaign propaganda cynically plays on two of the most basic spiritual drives of our human nature – to be part of a great cause and to be part of the community.

Thus, the popularity of tags such as #inittogether, #strongertogether, #togetherwecan.

It is no great secret that our secular culture is devoid of meaning and relationships.  First, by definition, to be “secular” is to be deprived of the most basic source of meaning and relationship – God.  Many may argue that “I am spiritual, but it’s a private matter” – but that doesn’t satisfy the human soul.  We are created to glorify the Triune God individually and as a people.  Anything less will leave us unfulfilled.

And so the culture grasps for fulfillment where it may be found.  Enter covid and the salvation of the vaccine.  For many people, this is their first taste of a great cause and a meaningful connection with others.

“The CDC, FDA, NIH and the media have data and studies that prove they are correct.”

Government health agencies and mainstream media fact-checkers have no shortage of studies, data, and stories that will contradict everything in this series of articles.  But few if any survive scrutiny.  Take, for example, the studies and endless stories of people falling ill to Ivermectin.  They are all hyper-inflated and miss the point that medical-grade Ivermectin taken in proper doses and sequenced with other drugs is an extremely safe and effective covid-19 therapy.

The stories of hospitals overflowing with unvaccinated patients?  Most are, again, inflated; based on biased PCR testing[38], selective sampling, and other tricks – watch over time as information leaks out to reveal actual numbers of vaccinated hospital patients (for example, the recent statement that 40% of covid fatalities in Maryland are fully vaccinated[39] and the actual percentage is probably quite higher due to biased testing and reporting).  Are there some hospitals experiencing a wave of unvaccinated covid-19 patients?  Probably.  Have any of those patients been provided safe and effective early treatment?  Almost none.  If they had, 80-90% of them would not be in the hospital; the 230 million people of nearly covid-19 free Uttar Pradesh, India are just one of many examples[40].  Ask yourself this – why hasn’t the safe, effective, inexpensive and simple solution that virtually eliminated covid in Uttar Pradesh (handing out Ivermectin-based home treatment kits to every family) been implemented in the U.S.?

As far as “official” data and statements regarding hospital demand causing restriction of treatment, little can be trusted.  Here is an example from the Phoenix area.  On September 16, 2021, Dr. Richard Carmona (former Surgeon General and Senior Advisor to Arizona Governor Ducey) stated, “The beds are filled, we’re having to cancel surgeries….  We having to delay appropriate medical care of cancer and other diseases…” with the implication that this was because of the unvaccinated.

Here is the actual systemwide census data from one of Arizona’s largest hospital systems:

Date C-19 Positive Inpatients C-19 Positive Ventilated
July 15, 2020 1,166 256
January 13, 2021 1,823 376
September 2, 2021 620 130

In other words, at the time that Dr. Carmona was making his inflammatory statements, the actual hospital census showed covid-19 patient levels were 1/3 the peak from the start of the year.  On top of that, it’s nearly impossible to know how many “C-19 inpatients” simply had a positive PCR test.  From speaking with physicians in the area, there was no hindrance to people receiving necessary medical treatment for cancer or other diseases.

“You are asking us to trust you over institutions like the CDC and FDA?”

For all the reasons presented in this article, on the issue of covid-19, the CDC and FDA are proving to be unreliable.

The facts and positions in this series of articles reflect the cumulative wisdom of practicing physicians, which is to say doctors who are actually practicing medicine and treating and curing tens of thousands of covid-19 patients (and more and more patients suffering harm from the genetic vaccines).  The majority of people making health policy decisions in governmental agencies and hospital systems have little or no direct clinical experience of treating covid-19 patients.

Nor is this the first time entire organizations and institutions have gone off the path of rationality to follow an ideology.  Most medical associations now proclaim that abortion is critical for “women’s health”, even though there is virtually no circumstance under which pregnancy is a threat to the physical health of the mother (almost all life-threatening complications develop after the point at which live birth is viable by c-section or induced delivery).  Most medical organizations now also support “gender transitioning” therapies and procedures for minors and advance the delusion that men can give birth.  You can find rivers of supposedly scientific data, studies, and testimonials that support these irrational, anti-science positions of the medical establishment.

The same lack of intellectual clarity appears to have taken hold of much of the medical establishment regarding the politically charged and fear-driven phenomena of covid-19.

Looking beyond the CDC and FDA, to Federal, State, and Local Governments, and the media, no lie is too bold to advance vaccine mandates.  Take the recent Southwest pilot’s strike.  In the face of 2,000 canceled flights in a single day, the government (with a straight face) parroted the lie that they strong-armed Southwest to manufacture – that the cancellations were due to “disruptive weather” despite the fact that no other airlines were affected by the notably mild weather that day.

What Is Needed from Bishops, Pastors, and Church Leaders

No Bishop, Pastor, or Church Leader should be advocating receipt of the experimental genetic vaccines.  Everyone should have an individual risk/benefit discussions with knowledgeable physicians to determine recommended medical options suitable for each person to reduce their risk of covid-19 illness.  Anyone seeking additional guidance on covid treatment and the genetic vaccines should consult reputable sources, based on the experience and findings of practicing physicians, like Truth for Health, Front Line Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC), and the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS), so they can be fully informed about vaccine risks, benefits, and alternatives and then decide what action to take.

All Bishops, Pastors, and Church Leaders should carefully review the information in this three-part series, and not stop there – this only scratches the surface.  If you (and your advisors) go through this information and find it not compelling against the overwhelming propaganda of mass vaccination proponents, you are encouraged to contact Truth for Health, so that you and those advising you can have an open conversation with our medical experts.  We believe when presented with the facts in open dialogue and debate, you will conclude that mass covid-19 vaccination is immoral.

We implore our Bishops, Pastors, Church Leaders, and all the Faithful to resist the immoral, dehumanizing, and oppressive measures of government, big business, and the media to force a mass vaccination campaign that is physically, mentally, and spiritually damaging to society.

Finally, Church leaders and all the Faithful must plan for the future.  Covid-19 is just the beginning.  The powers-that-be have learned they can advance most any agenda through a campaign of fear and in the name of “public health” – with secular institutions of power and influence falling dutifully in line.  The Body of Christ alone has the spiritual illumination and fortitude necessary to discern truth from falsehood and protect souls from this mounting tyranny.

[1] Zhang, L., et.al., “SARS-CoV-2 RNA reverse-transcribed and integrated into the human genome”  Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, May 25, 2021.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2105968118

[2] Corrigan, D.  “MIT & Harvard Study Suggests mRNA Vaccine Might Permanently Alter DNA After All”  Rights and Freedoms, March 16, 2021.  https://rightsfreedoms.wordpress.com/2021/08/13/mit-harvard-study-suggests-mrna-vaccine-might-permanently-alter-dna-after-all/

[3] Yahoo! News, “CDC: 99.5% of COVID-19 deaths are from unvaccinated individuals” MSN, July 8, 2021.  https://www.msn.com/en-us/lifestyle/did-you-know/cdc-995percent-of-covid-19-deaths-are-from-unvaccinated-individuals/vp-AALVDwg

[4] Fox News, The Ingraham Angle.  https://video.foxnews.com/v/video-embed.html?video_id=6266738894001&ref=twitter.com

[5] Undercurrents, “The Lies Behind the ‘Pandemic of Unvaxxed’”.  https://undercurrents723949620.wordpress.com/2021/08/16/the-lies-behind-the-pandemic-of-unvaxxed/

[6] Caplan, A., “It’s Okay for Docs to Refuse to Treat Unvaccinated Patients”  Medscape, October 13, 2021.  https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/958434

[7] Byrne, B., “Fauci says unvaccinated Americans could lead to dangers of fifth COVID wave.”  Insider Paper, October 17, 2021.  https://insiderpaper.com/video-fauci-unvaccinated-fifth-covid-wave-chris-wallace/

[8] Mason, T., “UCHealth Denies Kidney Transplant to Unvaccinated Woman & Donor”  CBS Denver, October 7, 2021.  https://denver.cbslocal.com/2021/10/07/uchealth-kidney-transplant-covid-vaccine/

[9] Toronto Star, August 26, 2021.  ‘Hate Speech’: The Toronto Star slammed for headline wishing DEATH on the unvaccinated – Toronto 99

[10] Fiore, K., “Texas Medical Board Dismisses Complaint Against HCQ Doc”  MedPage Today, November 4, 2020.  https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/covid19/89478

[11] Roussel, Y. and Raoult, D. “Influence of conflicts of interest on public positions in the COVID-19 era, the case of Gilead Sciences.”  New Microbes and New infections, November 2020.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nmni.2020.100710

[12] Redshaw, M., “Groundbreaking: Nebraska AG Says Doctors Can Legally Prescribe Ivermectin, HCQ for COVID, Calls Out FDA, CDC, Fauci, Media for ‘Fueling Confusion and Misinformation’”  The Defender, October 18, 2021.    https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/nebraska-ag-doug-peterson-legal-opinion-ivermectin-hcq-covid/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=a9f67b5a-4f9b-4b78-8124-bec5425eb630&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=a9f67b5a-4f9b-4b78-8124-bec5425eb630

[13]  Pontifical Academy of Life, “Moral Reflections on Vaccines Prepared from Cells Derived from Aborted Human Foetuses” 2005.  https://www.immunize.org/talking-about-vaccines/vaticandocument.htm 

[14] Baylis, F., “Stem cell research community drops 14-day limit on human embryo research”  The Conversation, May 27, 2021.  https://theconversation.com/stem-cell-research-community-drops-14-day-limit-on-human-embryo-research-161616

[15] Daleiden, D., “University of Pittsburgh Won’t Explain its Planned Parenthood Ties | Opinion”  Newsweek.  May 26, 2021.  https://www.newsweek.com/university-pittsburgh-wont-explain-its-planned-parenthood-ties-opinion-1594564

[16] Miller ER, Moro PL, Cano M, Shimabukuro TT. Deaths following vaccination: What does the evidence show?. Vaccine. 2015;33(29):3288-3292. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.05.023

[17] Deoni, S., et.al., “Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Early Child Cognitive Development: Initial Findings in a Longitudinal Observational Study of Child Health”  MedRxiv, August 11, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.10.21261846

[18] Yard, E., et.al., “Emergency Department Visits for Suspected Suicide Attempts Among Persons Aged 12–25 Years Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic — United States, January 2019–May 2021”  CDC Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, June 18, 2021.  http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7024e1

[19] Mulligan, C., “Deaths of despair and the incidence of excess mortality in 2020” VoxEU & CEPR, January 28, 2021.   https://voxeu.org/article/deaths-despair-and-incidence-excess-mortality-2020

[20] Charbonnier, E., et.al., “Psychological Vulnerability of French University Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Four-Wave Longitudinal Survey”  Int. J. Environ Res Public, Sept 2021.  https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34574623/

[21] Horigian, V., et.al., “Loneliness, Mental Health, and Substance Use among US Young Adults during COVID-19” Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, Jan-Mar 2021.  https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33111650/

[22] Loelace, R., “YouTube removing 10 million ‘bad’ videos per quarter, executive says”  Washington Times, August 26, 2021.  https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/aug/26/youtube-removing-10-million-bad-videos-quarter-exe/

[23] Parker, T., “YouTube censors video of Nobel Prize winner Dr. Satoshi Ōmura discussing ivermectin”  Reclaim the Net, July 2, 2021.  https://reclaimthenet.org/youtube-censors-dr-satoshi-omura-ivermectin/

[24] This Youtube video and others like it are no longer publicly available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xkWOpFk1GGk.  You can find a summary here:  https://www.newswars.com/now-is-the-time-to-use-ivermectin-tokyos-medical-assoc-chairman-recommends-ivermectin-to-all-doctors-to-treat-covid/

[25] Walach, H., et.al, “Response to ‘Incorrect use of data…’ by Prof. Dr. Eugène van Puijenbroek”  https://retractionwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Response-to-Expression-of-concern_3.docx.pdf

[26] 1,000 Covid Stories   https://1000covidstories.com/

[27] Vax Longhaulers  https://www.vaxlonghaulers.com/

[28] C18 Vax Reactions https://www.c19vaxreactions.com/

[29] No More Silence https://nomoresilence.world/

[30] Hoft, J. “Healthy 16-Year-Old Boy Dies During Online Class After Receiving Second COVID Shot from Pfizer”  Gateway Pundit, October 13, 2021.  https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/10/healthy-16-year-old-boy-dies-online-class-receiving-second-covid-shot-pfizer/

[31] WXYZ-TV Channel 7, Vaccines Harm Statements.     https://www.facebook.com/wxyzdetroit/photos/a.461583946134/10158207966696135

[32] The Testimonies Project  https://www.vaxtestimonies.org/en/

[33] Leventhal, R., “AMA: 96% of Physicians Are Fully Vaccinated”  Healthcare Innovation, June 14, 2021.   https://www.hcinnovationgroup.com/covid-19/news/21226677/ama-96-of-physicians-are-fully-vaccinated

[34] “Majority of Physicians Decline COVID Shots, according to Survey”  Association of American Physicians and Surgeons.  https://aapsonline.org/majority-of-physicians-decline-covid-shots-according-to-survey/

[35] OSHA Frequently Asked Questions.  Accessed October 21, 2021.   https://www.osha.gov/coronavirus/faqs

[36] Lensen, R., et.al., “Hepatitis C Virus Reactivation Following COVID-19 Vaccination – A Case Report”  International Medical Case Reports Journal, August 29, 2021.   https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8412816/

[37] Schwitzer, C., “The FDA did NOT grant full approval to the Pfizer shots” American Thinker, August 26, 2021. https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2021/08/the_fda_did_not_grant_full_approval_to_the_pfizer_shots.html

[38] Knightly, K., “WHO (finally) admits PCR tests create false positives”  Off Guardian, December 18, 2020.  https://off-guardian.org/2021/01/25/who-finally-admits-pcr-is-not-a-diagnostic-test/

[39] Pavlich, K., “Former CDC Director Gives Alarming Statistic on Fully Vaccinated COVID Deaths” Townhall, October 19, 2021.    https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2021/10/19/former-cdc-director-gives-alarming-statistic-on-fully-vaccinated-covid-deaths-n2597628

[40] Trial site Staff, “MSN Showcases the Amazing Uttar Pradesh Turnaround—The Ivermectin-based Home Medicine Kits”  TrialSite News, September 19, 2021.   https://trialsitenews.com/msn-showcases-the-amazing-uttar-pradesh-turnaround-the-ivermectin-based-home-medicine-kits/

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest

9 thoughts on “Immorality of the Covid-19 Mass Vaccination Program – Part III”

  1. Christina Christensen

    Drs Smith, Roy, and Gonnering,

    Thank you for all 3 parts of this concise overview of this disaster.
    I appreciate your science, your depth of concern and your moral insights.
    I will be using this 3 part series to educate anyone who is open to it. I’m sure many of my friends just haven’t been exposed to the full truth.
    Thank you and May God bless and protect your families.

  2. Pingback: Doing the Work of the Devil - Catholic Stand

  3. Every single one of the bases that this series was based on is wrong or completely misleading. This series was a trip into fantasy completely detached from reality. You selectively picked/used/twisted data over and over again to try to support what you wished was true. But it was all fake. Almost nothing in the series was the honest truth.

    This was the last part, right? If so, thank goodness.

    1. Dear Kyle-

      You’ve hit on the key issue – we have two groups of people living in vastly different realities. And yet – there can be only one reality. Here’s the basics of the covid reality:

      1. Covid is easily managed with early mutli-drug treatment. This was known by May 2020. Despite that, the CDC/FDA told (and continues to tell) people to “sicken at home.” That has never been a standard of care and has caused 80-90% of the fatalities.

      2. The shot is far more toxic and deadly than the CDC/FDA and others are willing to make known. And the shot is not necessary (and by epidemiology 101 is causing the dominant variants) – because (again) early treatment combined with the natural immunity that follows is the single best way out of this.

      That’s all there is to it. If the powers-that-be simply acted on those basic realities, covid would be a thing of the past, we wouldn’t have the brewing vaxed/unvaxed civil war, and we wouldn’t be chest deep in the quicksand of totalitarianism (the threat of the vax pass is truly evil).

      Yes – this was the end of the 3-part series. As events continue to unfold and demonstrate the futility of the shot and evil of the related coercion and misinformation, we’ll probably post a follow-up. So you have that to look forward to!

      Until then, I will continue to pray for you and those that live in your version reality. Seriously, I will, because we have to get past this, and prayer and fasting is the means by which that will happen.

      God bless – Steve

    2. Hi Steve,

      I think you hit the nail on the head about there being only one reality. The problem is that you’re not living in it with the claims you’re making.

      1. There is no wonder-cure being withheld from COVID patients. There was anecdotal evidence that some of those drugs may have worked even though there was no known reason for why they should work to treat COVID. Larger scale studies were done that show no benefits from those drugs. You can link to those early studies, or a couple select smaller, less-valuable studies that show anomalous results, but that doesn’t make your story true. If you think it is true, go down the medical route and get the rest of the medical community to believe you before you confuse and harm the general population with articles like this.

      2. The shot is not deadly. The three main vaccines being used in this country have caused very, very few deaths. Claiming those deaths in the VAERS were mostly due to the vaccine is a lie. And this is one that I think you understand. You know those people didn’t die due to the vaccine, but the numbers can help support the story you wish were true. I hope you’re actually just confused here, but I strongly suspect you’re simply lying to help support your fantasy.

      I also really hope and pray that we can get on the same page soon because this type of junk is hurting people. And it’s also hurting the church.

  4. Pingback: THVRSDAY EDITION – Big Pulpit

  5. Mr Smith (as well as Dr Moy Doctor Gonnering),
    Thank you for this article. It is regrettable that some of the past “critiques” on your writings have seemed more like ad hominen attacks.

    1. Thank you for that encouragement, Joe – we’re glad you appreciate these articles. God bless – Steve

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.