In this video, I do a quick rewind of history back to 1965, the end of Vatican II, the appearance of Humanae Vitae, and its widespread rejection, as a way of framing the appearance of the Traditiones Custodes by Francis.
This is not merely an attack on the Latin language of nice vestments, but a full-scale assault on the ties that bind Catholics of today with the deposit of faith “delivered once to the saints” (Jude 1:3).
TOPICS COVERED
- Why the year 1965 was a turning point in Church culture and world history.
- How the weak leadership of Pope Paul VI failed to stem the tide of dissent and confusion that flooded into the Church in the decade and a half after the Vatican closed.
- No one—no lay movement, no organization of clergy—was clamoring for the destruction of the Traditional Latin Mass
- The possible connections between the New World Order and the Novus Ordo Missae
- How the Extraordinary Form Latn Mass is a powerful inducement to conversion and true worship.
- The lack of discipling of wayward clergy on the matter of birth control led to a softening of the Catholic ground and introduced the present state of chaos.
- Why the Traditional Latin Mass is making a comeback.
RESOURCES MENTIONED
-
“Humanae Vitae” by St. Paul VI (1968).
-
The Contraception Deception: Catholic Teaching On Birth Control by Patrick Coffin. Get a copy here
- Sex Au Naturel: What It Is and Why It’s Good for Your Marriage. Get a copy here.
The Patrick Coffin Show podcast features weekly interviews with A-list influencers and outliers in the effort to recover the Judeo-Christian roots of the culture. Patrick is the Canadian-born former host of Catholic Answers Live, and he has raving fans around the world. He injects these fascinating interviews with his own distinctive blend of depth and levity. If you’re tired of politically correct mediaspeak, you want to see God back in the public square, and you’re not allergic to having a laugh, this is the place to be
To listen to Patrick’s video, click on Patrick Coffin Media at the bottom.
4 thoughts on “The Anti-Latin Mass Motu Proprio In Context”
What is the “fullness” of V2? Pls be specific.
Possible link…F1 does not accept the fullness of all that preceded V2, especially the timeless, beautiful Latin Mass offered by the great saints.
Clown masses, gay pride masses, pachamama idol masses…on and on. Yeah, that BS reeks with the fullness of V2 chaos.
Pingback: FRIDAY EDITION – Big Pulpit
This is the stuff of conspiracy theories. So many independent things are linked together where no link exists.
I do have one link though. The author loves the Latin Mass. The author also fails to accept the fullness of Vatican II as do many other latin mass adherents. Due to the number of latin mass adherents refusing the accept the fullness of Vatican II, the pope restricts the use of the latin mass to preserve church unity and prevent a tide of confusion and dissent.
Somehow, I don’t think the author’s own dissent is what he had in mind when lamenting recent pope’s refusal to lay down the law.
Perhaps we need to take a closer look at the results of the “fullness of Vatican II” before we go blaming Latin Mass adherents for the “tide of confusion and dissent”? To whit:
-3,000,000 fewer Catholics in the US than 2007
-70% of Catholics do not believe in the Real Presence
-34,000,000 Americans describe themselves as “former Catholics”
-1 in 5 lapsed Catholics no longer believe in God or religion
-63% of former Catholics stopped believing in God between the ages of 10 and 17
-Religious practice is collapsing in South America, and has almost totally collapsed in Europe in the decades since the council.
-For example, Ireland had a mass attendance rate of 91% in the aftermath of Vatican II. Now it is around 40%, and 2% in some parishes.
-Belgium, the Netherlands and Germany were enthusiastic implementers of Vatican II and Catholicism is close to death in all three.
-Nuns are close to extinction in many places
-Vocations to the priesthood? Lol.
-Curiously, the ONLY growth area in terms of measurable statistics seems to be the traditionalist seminaries where they have to turn people away because they are full and of course sky rocketing attendance at EF/TLM masses
It is very hard, objectively, to see how “the fullness of Vatican II” is anything other than a disaster for catholicism.