Subscribe via RSS Feed

How Do St. Thomas More and St. Thomas Aquinas Inspire You?

March 28, AD2014 6 Comments

\"Joseph

When we say, “Someone inspires us,” what do we mean? Do we mean someone fills us with good feelings or someone’s example pushes us on to do greater things? The word “inspire” comes from the Latin word, inspirare, which means “to breathe upon, to blow into,” or animate with an idea or purpose. As shown in Chapter 2 of Genesis, where God forms man out of the dust of the ground and gives him life through “breathing into” him, being truly inspired by someone is life-giving. It animates us with a good purpose. Therefore, when I say that St. Thomas More (More), the patron saint of lawyers, and St. Thomas Aquinas (Aquinas), the Angelic Doctor, inspire me, I mean that their lives and teachings “breathed into” me the desire to become truly a man of faith and reason. A man that follows his conscience and works humbly within the law to promote the common good of all people, which first starts with protecting the dignity of all human life, marriage, and religious freedom. 

Not unlike the political leaders in More’s and Aquinas’ time, many of today’s political leaders abandon their own private consciences in their ambition for power and fame. As More wisely points out, “When statesmen forsake their own private conscience for the sake of their public duties, they lead their country by a short route to chaos.”[1] We do not have to look beyond our own borders to see the truth of More’s statement. Furthermore, as Aquinas illustrates, the sacrifice of one’s conscience for the attainment of power, fame, or glory only brings further emptiness to the individual, not “happiness” or final fulfillment with God.[2] Therefore, both Aquinas and More inspire me to always follow my conscience lest I endanger more than my own soul – my country as well.

Aquinas and More also inspire me as a young lawyer to work within the law to promote life, marriage, and religious liberty. For both Aquinas and More, law’s final cause or end is to promote the common good, which is the directing of man towards his ultimate end, happiness.[3] Not happiness in the subjective sense (“just do whatever makes one feel happy”), but the natural right to pursue happiness as shown in the Declaration of Independence. The promotion of true happiness begins with protecting the dignity of all human life – a right to life that presupposes all other rights. One cannot grasp human rights in general without first understanding this essential right. Furthermore, laws that undermine marriage as between one man and one woman uproot and destabilize the family, the basis of civilization and the first community as Aquinas describes it. Finally, laws that inhibit religious freedom by forcing a person to violate his conscience not only creates instability by pitting the state against religion, but it also works to keep religion out of the public square.   

Unlike many Catholic politicians, St. Thomas More and St. Thomas Aquinas inspire me to take the road less traveled, the road of faith and reason. This means not separating my personal beliefs from my public duties. It means not going with the crowd for “fellowship’s sake.” It means following my conscience even if I walk this path alone.  As St. Thomas More once said to his friend, “For when we die, and you are sent to heaven for doing your conscience, and I am sent to hell for not doing mine, will you come with me, for fellowship’s [sake]?”[4]

As St. Thomas More once told the Chief Justice of England, “Death comes for us all… even for kings.”[5] The question, however, is not when death will come, but how we will meet our death. Will we be able to say as St. Thomas More did, “I die the King’s good servant, but God’s first?”[6] Or, as St. Thomas Aquinas warned us in the Summa Theologica, will something like wealth, honor, fame, power, or pleasure prevent us from achieving true “happiness?”[7] The lives and teachings of St. Thomas More and St. Thomas Aquinas have “breathed into” me a good purpose – to become like them, a true man of faith and reason.


[1] A Man for All Seasons.
[2] St. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica, Pt. I-II, Q. 90, Art. 2 (Fathers of the English Dominican Province trans., Christian Classics 1981) [hereinafter Summa Theologica].
[3] Id.
[4] A Man for All Seasons (argument between Thomas More and the Duke of Norfolk about signing the Oath of Supremacy).
[5] A Man for All Seasons (Thomas More speaking to the Chief Justice).
[6] A Man for All Seasons (Thomas More before his death).
[7] Summa Theologica, supra note 2.

 

\"JosephJoseph Tompkins is a third year law student at Ave Maria School of Law and currently serves as the Business Manager on the Editorial Board of the Ave Maria Law Review. His law review article on the Catholic influence behind the First Amendment was recently selected for publication and presented to Justice Scalia of the United States Supreme Court. Joseph graduated from Ave Maria University with honors in 2009 and will do the same from Ave Maria School of Law in 2014. He is a proud husband and father of two children.

Filed in: Education

If you enjoyed this essay, subscribe below to receive a daily digest of all our essays.

Thank you for supporting us!

  • Jeff_McLeod

    I find myself being molded into the way St. Thomas Aquinas thinks. I have learned so much from him over the years, he is a palpable presence in my life, like a teacher. He taught me how to think and he continues to do so.

    Do you notice that people who dismiss the Church as irrelevant carefully avoid acknowledging the existence of saints?

    They think faith is just doctrine, and this thrills them because they think they can win with word games. They could NEVER encounter the saints.

    Thank you so much for your timely words about saints as our companions and our inspiration.

  • duhem

    Fine article. An interesting point about St. Thomas More. The local Anglican group who crossed the Tiber (Church congregation and priest) several years ago called themselves “The St. Thomas More Society”. I think he would like that.
    Bob Kurland

  • cordy fan

    I read the entire Summa Theologica ( sans objections) after reading the entire Bible and most of Augustine. It’s the second most important book on earth and yet, it had a very tragic flaw for which John Paul II apologized…ie it affirmed the killing of heretics which the contemporary Pope Innocent IV made binding on secular princes in 1253 AD ( read “Inquisition” at new advent Catholic Encyclopedia/ section D Punishments/ last several par.’s). What that shows is that even saints can get many people killed via a sincere erroneous conscience. Now “coercion of spirit” was condemned in section 80 of
    “Splendor of the Truth” by the Pope who apologized for the violence within the Inquisition. Most first millenium saints were against killing heretics so Aquinas was actually overturning the predominant strain in tradition to that date just as Innocent IV was the first Pope to make killing heretics mandatory.
    Aquinas with that and with a few more mistakes is still the most important author in history to read. He clarifies the Bible 97% of the time whereas Augustine is not clarity but depth concerning the Bible.
    On sex, Aquinas followed Augustine into a position now rejected by the Church…ie asking for the marriage debt without intending explicitly procreation was venial sin to both men and you can still see their error in providentialists on the internet. The Church in affirming the use of the natural cycles first in 1853 after Pouchet had scientifically shed light on them, is saying that it is not venial sin to ask for the debt during known infertile times. But overly heavy Augustine readers will hold on to the old error touth and nail. Because Aquinas followed Augustine on sexual matters both men ended up wrong on the Immaculate Conception because Augustine said original sin is passed on by concupiscence and Mary’s parents enjoyed sex so Mary contracted it but was cleansed of it before birth. The Church eventually rejected that also from both men. And the Church at Trent and in the catechism now notes that original sin is passed on by propagation not concupiscence.

  • Pingback: What Can The Saints Teach Us About Lent? - BigPulpit.com

  • David Peters

    Joseph this is a great article. Thanks for sharing how these two Saints have influenced you in a positive way. I love how Catholicism combines faith and reason together. God bless.

  • Henry

    With St. Thomas More we should not overlook the fact that he was instrumental in having otherwise good Catholics – who were termed “heretics” for publishing an unauthorized translation of the Scriptures – killed at the stake. Compassion was scarcely high on his list of virtues while perhaps fanaticism was more obvious.